MQSA Hot
Topics (Continued)
Last Updated
September 19, 2005 5
5.
Facilities That Are
Using Greater Than Five Days to Establish or
Re-establish Operating Levels
The ACR manual states that taking
a 5-day density average of sensitometric strips is the
proper procedure for establishing or re-establishing
processor QC operating levels. The FDA has gone further
to state that, “ the number of days needed to establish
the operating levels depends on the time it takes for
the processor to reach chemical equilibrium or a
"seasoned" status. In practice, this is usually achieved
when the chemicals in the developer tank have been
replaced or "turned over" 2-3 times. For a given film,
this time is a function of the developer tank size, the
replenishment rate, and the number of films processed
(patient volume). Also, different film emulsion types
have different replenishment rates per sheet of film,
thus requiring different periods for the same processor
to reach a seasoned status.
Based on experience to date, we
expect the majority of facilities to use up to a 5-day
averaging period. However, if a facility uses a longer
period, it should provide empirical data or
recommendations from the film manufacturer explaining
the reasons for the longer time period. Regardless of
the length of time needed for establishing or
re-establishing operating levels, the facility must
document the MD, DD, and B+F values daily. Even though
there are no regulatory action limits during this
period, monitoring of processing conditions is still
important as these values may identify problems with
developer temperature, replenishment rates, and other
variables.”
Comments
The inspectors will be checking to
make sure you are following your QC test procedures
carefully. The inspectors will be checking the
documentation from the film manufacturer’s
recommendation, if for any reason the facility is using
greater than 5 days to establish or re-establish
sensitometric operating levels.
The Infection Control Policy is
addressed in MQSA as the following:
21 CFR 900.12(e)(13) Facilities
shall establish and comply with a system specifying
procedures to be followed by the facility for cleaning
and disinfecting mammography equipment after contact
with blood or other potentially infectious materials.
This system shall specify the methods for documenting
facility compliance with the infection control
procedures established and shall:
Comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local
regulations pertaining to infection control; and
Comply with the manufacturer's recommended
procedures for the cleaning and disinfection of the
mammography equipment used in the facility; or
If adequate manufacturer's recommendations are not
available, comply with generally accepted guidance
on infection control, until such recommendations
become available.
Comments
The Infection
control policy should include the following information:
Name of the disinfectant used
Manufacturer recommendations for disinfectant
Copy of disinfectant reference material, for
example: instructions for use
Step-by-step instructions on how to disinfect the
mammography unit when contaminated with blood or
other potentially infectious materials, for example:
where to spray the disinfectant (on the cloth), and
how long to leave the disinfectant on the unit, etc.
How to disinfect gross contamination (usually
indicated on the disinfectant)
How disinfection will be documented and where
(verification of disinfection is an MQSA
requirement)
Documentation of in-between
patient cleaning is not a requirement of MQSA, but the
written procedure for performing this task is required.
It is advisable for ease during
the inspection and for the facility employees, that
these items be clearly stated and that a copy of the
manufacturer’s recommendations be kept with the
disinfection policy.
Conducting the
daily processor QC when the sensitometer is not
available. On 10-18-1999, FDA approved a request for an
alternative to sensitometric-densitometric testing of
processor performance that can be used for a period of
up to 2 weeks when the facility’s sensitometer is
unavailable.
When using the
alternative test, processor performance is considered
satisfactory if:
The optical
density of the film at the center of an image of a
standard FDA-accepted phantom is at least 1.20 when
exposed under typical clinical conditions.
The optical
density of the film at the center of the phantom
image changes no more than +/- 0.20 from the
established operating level.
The density
difference between the background of the phantom and
an added test object, used to assess image contrast,
is measured and does not vary by more than +/- 0.05
from the established operating level.
In addition
To evaluate
base+fog an additional measurement of density must
be made either of a shielded portion of the phantom
image film or of an unexposed film. In accordance
with 21 CFR 900.12 (e)(1)(i), the base+fog density
must be within +0.03 of the established operating
level.
As with the original test, this
alternative test must be conducted “each day clinical
films are processed, but before processing of clinical
films.” All results must be recorded. Again, as with the
original test, if processor performance fails to meet
any part of the alternative test, the problem must be
corrected before processing is resumed