Last Updated:
09/28/11 02:44:40 PM
|
|
MQSA Hot
Topics
Last Updated
September 19, 2005 |
|
|
|
1. |
Continuing Experience
Documentation for Interpreting Physicians Who Read at
Multiple Sites |
|
Comments |
|
Physicians continuing experience
documentation may include the following:
-
A letter,
table, or printout from each facility
-
Signed by a
responsible facility official
-
Stating that
he/she has interpreted a given number of mammograms
at the facility in a given time period
The inspector
will no longer accept printouts from
the interpreting physician’s office
that include all sites where they
read.
*The only exception to this would
be if the ownership of the facilities where the
interpreting physicians read is the same person(s)
signed by the same responsible facility official.
For example: If a radiologist’s
office owns 5 different sites where they read and one
coordinator who keeps up with their continuing
experience for all sites, that coordinator can provide a
list documenting their continuing experience. This list
must be signed by a responsible facility official who
may be the same person if the official is employed by
the owner of all of the facilities.2 |
|
|
|
2. |
Using the +/- Density
Settings on the Phantom |
|
Comments |
|
The +/- density control settings
on the mammography equipment should not be used to keep
the phantom chart in limits. Only if a change in film
optical density is confirmed to be due to a change in
the film emulsion batch, and if the magnitude of the
change is within the expected batch-to-batch variation
for that film type, then an adjustment of the density
control setting to bring the phantom background optical
density back into control is an appropriate corrective
action. If for any other reason your phantom falls out
of limits, then the service provider must be called to
correct the problem. |
|
3 |
|
3. |
When a Facility Has
More Than One Processor
|
|
The annual survey or equipment
evaluation requirement for all clinically used
mammography processors is addressed in MQSA as the
following:
-
21 CFR 900.12 (e)(9)(i) At
least once a year, each facility shall undergo a
survey by a medical physicist or by an individual
under the direct supervision of a medical physicist.
At a minimum this survey shall include the
performance of tests to ensure that the facility
meets the quality assurance requirements of the
annual test described in 900.12(e)(5) and (6) and
the weekly phantom image quality test described in
900.12(e)(2).
-
21 CFR 900.12(e)(10)
Mammography equipment evaluations. Additional
evaluations of mammography units or image processors
shall be conducted whenever a new unit or processor
is installed, a unit or processor is dissembled and
reassembled at a new location or major components of
a mammography unit or processor equipment are
changed or repaired. These evaluations shall be used
to determine whether
-
the new or changed equipment
meets the requirements of applicable standards in
900.12(b) and (e). All problems shall be corrected
before the new or changed equipment is put into
service for examinations or film processing. The
mammography equipment evaluation shall be performed
by a medical physicist or by an individual under the
direct supervision of a medical physicist.
|
|
Comments |
|
The annual survey or equipment
evaluation must include all processors used clinically,
even those at remote sites or back-up processors. It is
the responsibility of the facility to inform the medical
physicist prior to introducing a different processor
into mammography and at the annual survey. The equipment
evaluation requirement for the processors is the
following:
|
-
Sensitometric
testing as described in 900.12(e)(1)
-
Phantom
testing as described in 900.12(e)(2)
-
System
artifact evaluation as described in 900.12(e)(5)(ix)
-
Dose
determination as described in 900.12(e)(5(vi) if
clinical techniques increase significantly
-
Verification
of the appropriate processing solutions as described
in 900.12(b)(13)
4
|
|
4. |
Quality Assurance
Records and Written Standard Operating Procedures for QC
Tests |
|
The Quality Assurance Policy is
addressed in MQSA as the following:
21 CFR 900.12 (d)(2) Quality
assurance records. The lead interpreting physician,
quality control technologist, and medical physicist
shall ensure that records concerning employee
qualifications, mammography technique and procedures,
quality control (including monitoring data, problems
detected by
analysis of that data, corrective actions and the
effectiveness of the corrective actions), safety, and
protection are properly maintained and updated in the
mammography facility’s quality assurance manual. These
quality control records shall be kept for each test
specified in 900.12(e) and (f) until the next annual
inspection has been completed and FDA has determined
that the facility is in compliance with the quality
assurance requirements or until the test has been
performed two additional times at the required
frequency, whichever is longer. |
|
Comments |
|
The quality assurance (QA) records
that must be maintained are the following:
|
-
Personnel
Responsibilities: qualified mammography personnel
assigned appropriate QA tasks
-
Technique
Charts/Tables: the mammography techniques and
procedures used in conducting mammograms
-
Quality
Control (QC) test Records: including QC test
procedures, test performance and monitoring, data
analysis and timely corrective actions for each.
-
Procedures for
safety and protection of patients and person
|
|
Facilities have the flexibility to
use procedures that best enable them to meet the
required QC test criteria and outcomes (tests to be
done, frequency, and especially the action limits to be
met), just as long as they are consistent with the MQSA
regulations. The inspector will look for the written
standard operating procedures for the QC tests. If the
facility has not written their standard operating
procedures, then they must document what they use for
their standard operating procedures. If a facility has
adopted the ACR manual for their QC test procedures,
they must adhere to it. The ACR manual has listed a
number of circumstances under which it may be
appropriate to re-establish the processor QC operating
levels. These events include:
|
-
When a film
manufacturer makes a change to a film currently in
use and recommends that the processor QC program be
re-established;
-
A change in
film volume;
-
A change of
brand or types of chemicals used;
-
A change in
film brand or type;
-
A change in
replenishment rates;
-
A change in
development time (e.g., going from extended to
standard cycle);
-
A change in
the settings on a specific gravity automixer; Using
a different sensitometer or densitometer;
-
A change in
film processor;
-
Running out of
film thus preventing a crossover from being done
correctly.
|
|
Keep in mind that changing the
chemistry as part of routine preventative maintenance is
NOT justification for changing the QC operating levels.
The reason for re-establishing the operating levels must
be noted in the remarks section of the QC chart. |
|
|
|
More |
|
|