Last Updated:
09/28/11 02:08:40 PM
|
|
Hepatitis C FAQ |
|
The Southern Nevada Health District is
advising patients who receive injected anesthesia medication
at the Endoscopy Center of Nevada (700 Shadow Lane) of a
risk for possible exposure to hepatitis C and other
bloodborne pathogens. The health district is recommending
patients who had procedures requiring injected anesthesia at
the clinic between March 2004 and January 11, 2008, contact
their primary care physicians or health care providers to
get tested for hepatitis C as well as hepatitis B and HIV. |
|
|
|
Why is the health district
making these recommendations?
|
How were the cases
discovered?
- The cluster of illnesses came to the attention of the
health district in January 2008.
- These cases were reported to the health district by area
physicians.
- Nevada law requires that medical providers notify public
health officials when they identify a number of different
diseases, including hepatitis C.
- The common link between cases was identified through the
routine investigation of the cases reported by medical
providers, which includes an interview of the patient.
|
Why did it take several
months for this to come to the attention of the health
district?
- Most people infected with hepatitis C virus do not
develop symptoms and do not know that they have been
infected. As a result, these infections would not have
been reported to the health district.
- An infection with hepatitis C that results in the
patient developing symptoms (acute disease) is rare so
it is an unusual occurrence that brought this problem to
the attention of the health district.
- On average, two cases of acute hepatitis C are
reported each year in Clark County. Six cases have been
identified in relation to this investigation.
|
How were patients exposed?
- A syringe (not a needle) that was used to administer
medication to a patient was reused on the same patient to
draw up additional medication.
- The process of redrawing medication using the same
syringe could have contaminated the vial from which the
medicine was drawn with the blood of the patient.
- The vial, which was not labeled for use on multiple
patients, was then used for a second patient (with a clean
needle and syringe).
- If that vial was contaminated with the blood of the
first patient, any subsequent patients given medication from
that vial could have been exposed to bloodborne pathogens.
|
How did you determine the
link between these cases?
- Of the six known cases, five had procedures on the same
day. Genetic testing on four of the cases from that day has
identified they likely came from a common source.
- The patient that had a procedure on a different day does
not share a common source as the other four. This indicates
the problem that allowed disease transmission to occur was
not a one-time event, but had recurred over an extended
period of time.
- Investigation of the clinic practices identified common
practices, which would allow disease to be transmitted in
this manner.
|
What actions have been taken
to correct the unsafe injection control practices?
- The unsafe injection practices associated with these
cases were identified during the investigation conducted in
mid-January. The injection practices that lead to the
exposure have been corrected, so no new patient exposures
should be occurring.
- As it can take several months for the symptoms of
hepatitis C to appear, additional cases might be identified
despite no ongoing transmission of disease.
|
Who performed the
investigation?
- The response was led by the Southern Nevada Health
District, and the team included members of the Nevada State
Bureau of Licensure and Certification and the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
|
How many people will be
diagnosed with hepatitis C, B or HIV from this
investigation?
- It is unknown how many people were infected at the
clinic. Hepatitis C, B and HIV are routinely found in the
population. A significant number of people might have been
infected prior to their procedure. Although testing can
determine if a person is infected, it cannot determine the
source of the infection.
|
How serious are these
illnesses?
- Hepatitis C, B or HIV can result in a range of disease
severity, and can eventually result in death.
- It is important that patients speak with a physician or
health care provider if you have one of these diseases. A
physician will be able to address specific risks for serious
illness and develop a plan to monitor your health.
|
How many cases of hepatitis
C are reported to the health district each year?
- On average, two cases of acute hepatitis C are
identified each year in Clark County.
- Most people who become infected with hepatitis C
initially have mild or no symptoms and do not know that
they have been infected unless they are tested by a
doctor. Only a small percentage of people infected with
hepatitis C develop acute disease and have any outward
signs of infection.
|
What is the Southern Nevada
Health District’s role in the response?
- The Southern Nevada Health District is responsible
for investigating reports of illness in our community in
order to takes steps to protect the health and
well-being of the public.
- Once notified of a reportable disease the health
district begins an investigation and works with the
appropriate agencies to address any issues identified
and make recommendations to help prevent this type of
situation from occurring again.
|
As a patient how can I
protect myself when getting these types of medical
procedures?
- It is important to remember the transmission of the
disease in these cases were not related to the medical
procedures, but rather to the anesthesia administered to the
patient.
- When proper injection practices are followed, medical
procedures, including colonoscopies or similar procedures,
are generally safe.
- All health care professionals and medical facilities
should follow safe injection practices and infection control
procedures. Patients can and should ask their medical
providers about the practices used in their facility.
|
Are these types of medical
procedures safe?
- Preventive medical procedures are an important part of
protecting yourself against the development of diseases,
including cancer. If recommended by your physician, there is
no reason why you should avoid undergoing these types of
medical procedures.
- Although this investigation focused on a center that
performed endoscopies, the source of the exposure was the
way the anesthesia was administered.
|
What is being done to
prevent this from happening again?
- The Southern Nevada Health District, the Nevada State
Health Division and the Bureau of Licensure and
Certification are providing technical bulletins and
educational materials to medical facilities and providers in
an effort to educate the health care community and prevent
these types of incidents from happening in the future.
|
Why is the health district
also recommending testing for hepatitis B and HIV?
- The investigation revealed practices that could have
exposed patients to the blood of another patient.
Although hepatitis C was the focus of the investigation,
hepatitis B and HIV can be transmitted in the same
manner.
|
What are the recommendations
for people who test positive for hepatitis C, B or HIV?
- Options for disease management and possible treatment
options, as well as regular health monitoring, should be
discussed with a physician, who can determine the
appropriate next steps for the patient.
|
|
|